Understanding the difference: raw, processed, and ultra-processed foods
First of all, it is essential to distinguish between processing and ultra-processing. Processing a food is not inherently bad: it is, in fact, what has allowed humanity to eat, preserve, cook, and diversify its diet.
- Raw foods
These are natural products that are unmodified or only minimally modified: fruits, vegetables, eggs, fish, legumes, whole grains. Their composition remains close to their original state². - Processed foods
They have undergone a simple physical or chemical modification (cooking, fermentation, pasteurization, freezing, etc.). Their structure remains largely intact and their ingredients are easy to identify: artisanal bread, cheeses, canned vegetables, compotes with no added sugar³. - Ultra-processed foods (UPFs)
This is where the problem arises. According to the NOVA classification (used by the WHO), UPFs contain more than five ingredients and additives designed to mimic the taste, texture, or color of natural foods: flavorings, flavor enhancers, sweeteners, emulsifiers, colorants⁴.
These industrial processes are often intended to increase shelf life, palatability, and profitability, at the expense of nutritional and ecological quality⁵.
When processing denatures food
Research findings converge: the more a food is processed, the less it resembles what our bodies are designed to recognize. Ultra-processed foods are often high in added sugars, refined fats, salt, and additives, but low in fiber, vitamins, and essential micronutrients⁶.
The CNRS sums up this paradox clearly: *“It’s not just the calories that matter, but how they are structured”*¹. The food matrix, that is, the natural organization of nutrients within a food, plays a fundamental role in satiety, digestion, and metabolic response. In ultra-processed products, this matrix is often destroyed: nutrients are isolated, recombined, and re-textured, which disrupts appetite regulation and promotes automatic overconsumption⁷.